flexible pavement design aashto method example

Therefore, it is recommended to provide initially stronger pavement structures.

This could be a major contributing factor to the accelerated deterioration of flexible pavement. The sample results indicate that the stage design strength ratio is relatively low compared to the corresponding increase in load applications especially at advanced service times. The resulting two-stage pavement designs are then used to obtain an indicator called the stage design strength ratio (percentage) defined as the ratio of the relative strength change to the design relative strength. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) method, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) method, and the Asphalt Institute (AI) method) to yield pavement designs using stage load applications values specified for each investigated design load applications level.

The approach in this study applies a two-stage solution to the three popular design methods of flexible pavement (i.e. The goal of this research is to investigate a possible relationship between the accelerated pavement deterioration rates and pavement design strength using a two-stage design analysis approach. The accelerated deterioration of flexible pavement and its relation to design strength requirements is a major problem facing highway engineers.

Flexible pavement design aashto method example